, an event occurred in Boston, which consisted of British troops shooting upon colonists. People refer to this as a massacre, but they only look at one side of the story. The Boston Massacre in was not really a massacre, but a mutual riot (Boston Massacre History Society) Analytical Essay The Boston Massacre is one of the most controversial events in American history that occurred in Boston before the American Revolution. Certainly, it has a fundamental role in the development of America as a nation, which led it to have a huge motivation for revolution Jun 21, · The Boston Massacre was and is still a debatable Massacre. The event occurred on March 5, It involved the rope workers of the colonial Boston and two British regiments, the twenty-ninth and the fourteenth regiments. Eleven people were shot in the incident; five people were killed and the other six were merely wounded
Boston Massacre Essay - Words | Bartleby
Please join StudyMode to read the full document. The Boston Massacrewas the first bloodshed between the British and the American colonists, which ultimately lead to war between the two, boston massacre essay.
Here, I will discuss the events leading up to the Massacrewhich the hostilities of the colonial people will be discussed. I believe that the British troops fired the first shot, but were ultimately lead to this point through the colonists antagonization, boston massacre essay.
I have broken this paper down into two main pieces. The first will be the events that lead to the Boston Massacre happening. The second will be the accounts of Captain Preston, and the Paul Revere engraving.
The political events leading up to the Boston Massacre started with unfair taxes. The first tax, in which George Greenville, boston massacre essay, the boston massacre essay prime minister ordered, was known as the sugar act.
With this, Britain lowered duties on paid molasses, but also raised taxes on all imported goods to the colonies. Violations of such would result in prosecution by the British vice-admiralty. Pearson, 98 After such a tax, the British imposed another, harsher tax on the colonists. THe stamp act, required colonists to place stamps on everything paper bound. The idea came from a similar tax the British used on their own people. Once again, no taxation without representation was a violation of the colonists beliefs.
The stamp act gave more colonists the idea that Britain was not on their Boston Massacre The Massacre that was held in Boston Massachusetts on March 5, boston massacre essay, was a small yet horrific event.
It started out as colonist teased and taunted the British soldiers. They also threw rocks and whatever else they could throw at them. The soldiers reacted to this by firing back at the colonist killing five people, boston massacre essay, three were killed on impact and two died later on, boston massacre essay, several were wounded.
Immediately after, the colonist disappeared and the soldiers reported back to their barracks. Even though we cannot be exact on what happened for sure about what happened that day; some eyewitnesses claim they heard the commander tell the soldiers to load their weapons and fire. British troops were originally sent to Boston to enforce the Townshend Act. The Boston Massacre is one of the many reasons why the thirteen colonies of Britain in America came together against the British Monarchy.
There were many reasons why the Colonists felt that they should not be treated as the British treated them. The day before the massacre took place, many of civilians took different sides than the British troops at John Gray's Ropewalk in the Fort Hill district.
The soldiers in boston massacre essay misunderstanding were arrested but pleaded not The Boston Massacre What happened the night of the Boston massacre? During boston massacre essay reading you will walk through the events written by four different sources leading up to that night of march 5, and be witnesses to the trial where captain Preston and his men are being tried for murder, defended by Samuel Adams.
Boston Massacre in Facts and Numbers the Massacre occurred on the evening of March 5, Five civilians boston massacre essay as a result of the incident, three died on the scene and two died later.
Some websites incorrectly add up the number of victims to be seven in total. All victims of the MassacreCrispus Attucks, Samuel Gray, James Caldwell, Samuel Maverick and Patrick Carr, were buried at Granary Burying Ground in Boston.
There were two separate Boston Massacre trials. The trial of Captain Preston started almost 8 month after the incident and lasted for one week, boston massacre essay, from October 24, to October 30, The second trial was for the soldiers. Preston and six of his men were acquitted, two others were found guilty of manslaughter.
The heavy military presence in Boston that leads to the Massacre was the result of British enforcement of American History Boston Massacre Essay Boston Massacre Essay The Boston Massacre was an extremely important event in American History. Also, it is boston massacre essay very controversial topic. To this dayno one can really give an accurate description of the events that transpired.
The Boston Massacre was not a random event at all, many actions led up to the massacre. As a result of this disaster, America was changed forever and sent on a road towards revolution. The Boston Massacre was a defining moment in American history. This is totally false. The French and Boston massacre essay war put England in debt making England look for other sources of income.
The king of England believed that the colonists should help to pay for the war because it took place in America. For a few months prior to the massacreBritish troops had been stationed in Boston. The soldiers were in Boston to help with the collection of money to pay for duties on imported goods. Tensions were high between boston massacre essay townspeople and the soldiers, boston massacre essay. Colonist greatly resented the soldiers because they believed that there should not be military personal This notable moment in American history was a spark in the colonies that eventually led to the American colonies boston massacre essay up arms against England.
The major controversy debated is whether or not the British officer on duty at the time gave the order to fire on the crowd or not. There have been many different stances on the argument but the fact of the matter is that the British officer in command did not give the order to fire into the crowd. To better understand why this British officer did not give the command to fire on the crowd one must first look into the situations in Boston leading up to March 5th Boston in was a very volatile place in regards to disdain between the colonists living in America and their British counterparts.
Two years prior intwo regiments of British regulars were quartered in Boston to assist in instilling British rule on Boston1. This, boston massacre essay, along with the Stamp Act and Townshend duties, which were more taxes the colonists had to pay, placed upon Boston which angered the people to boston massacre essay point of The Boston Massacre brought about questions and arguments between Great Britain and the colonies that had been under surface for quite some time.
Most people think of the Boston Massacre as some riled up colonists tormenting the invasive redcoats and then paying the price of antagonizing, but there was a much bigger meaning behind the killings. As in any war, there were two very different stories from either side trying boston massacre essay validate their actions. All of the Acts and restrictions placed upon the colonies had finally boiled to the point of explosion; there was much more behind the Boston Massacre than it seems on the surface.
On March 15, five Bostonians were shot dead in the streets of their hometown by British soldiers. British officer Captain Thomas Preston claimed that the colonists were throwing snowballs, tormenting the soldiers, and eventually even attacking them, and that the soldiers were merely protecting themselves.
This excuse is a front on the more elaborate, ongoing power struggle that was going on between Britain and the colonies. Britain wanted total control of the colonies but they were faced with resistance; more than they could handle peacefully. The colonies also had ulterior motives behind The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, and was a catalyst to a large number of changes within the colonies as well as the American Revolution. One question that is often brought up is who boston massacre essay to blame for the actual occurrence?
However, there is no question because the British are obviously to blame for the boston massacre essay of the event. Probably one of the most important reasons why the British are to blame for the Boston Massacre is their unnecessary behavior. The British Troops killed or wounded American citizens unexpectedly and irrationally Doc B. This account of events is consistent throughout many other documents, boston massacre essay, and is the horrible truth.
The Americans simply taunted a few of the soldiers who were already out of line. The throwing of rocks and calling of names is not a valid reason to kill.
Placing British Troops in a major city is simply bound to result in problems, especially when they often times would abuse the citizens verbally and physically Doc D.
This kind of abuse occurred on both sidesmore frequently to the Americans, but the British was the party that ended up killing over it, boston massacre essay. Throwing rocks and snowballs is nothing compared to the boston massacre essay of five innocent Americans.
The male colonists, which all of the victims were, had the right to life as well as liberty Doc G. What the colonists did was not against any laws, or written documentations. However, the act of killing another man is. With tensions between the colonial townspeople and the higher class British soldiers sparking conflicts, the Boston Massacre was sure to happen at one point.
As the most boston massacre essay story goes, colonists threw snowballs at the soldiers, boston massacre essay, called them nasty names, and dared them to fire their bayonets. The Redcoats responded as so by readying their weapons and shooting bullets into the crowd. Five people were killed in this incident, including Crispus Attucks the only African American that was killed.
The real question here is who started it, the Redcoats or the antagonizing colonists? Here they are, once again controlling your life. What would you do? Would you call them names and throw boston massacre essay in hopes of it getting better, or would you stand there and let it happen? The colonists are at fault for the losses of the Boston Massacreon both sides of the bayonet.
In all four of my Sign Up, boston massacre essay. Sign In. Sign Up Sign In. Home Essays The Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre Topics: American RevolutionBostonTownshend Acts Pages: 7 words Published: June 21, Continue Reading Please join StudyMode to read the full document, boston massacre essay.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful. Boston Massacre Essay
The Boston Massacre - Snow and Gunpowder - Extra History
, time: 10:30Essay On Boston Massacre - Words | Bartleby
Analytical Essay The Boston Massacre is one of the most controversial events in American history that occurred in Boston before the American Revolution. Certainly, it has a fundamental role in the development of America as a nation, which led it to have a huge motivation for revolution Apr 24, · The Boston Massacre refers to an altercation that occurred when America was a new land, and still technically a colony of the British Empire. The facts of the Boston Massacre are as follows: the parties involved were a group of British soldiers and a group of colonists or patriots , an event occurred in Boston, which consisted of British troops shooting upon colonists. People refer to this as a massacre, but they only look at one side of the story. The Boston Massacre in was not really a massacre, but a mutual riot (Boston Massacre History Society)
No comments:
Post a Comment